Law Office of Frances Crockett

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Martin Luther King Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail, April 16, 1963

Home

Attorney Profile

Practice Areas

News

Contact Us

July 10, 2007 Albuquerque Tribune

A former detainee at the Regional Correctional Center is suing the private company that runs the Downtown Albuquerque lockup, saying he didn't get adequate medical care after he fractured his jaw playing handball. According to his lawsuit, Robert Delayo hurt himself Jan. 1, 2006, and was taken to the Albuquerque Regional Medical Center, where he received X-rays that showed a fracture. A physician told him he should follow up with an oral surgeon within two or three days. It wasn't until Jan. 27 that Delayo saw an oral surgeon, according to the lawsuit. 

The lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Albuquerque alleges Cornell Companies Inc., a former warden, and the head of the jail's Health Services Center knew about Delayo's condition but "made no effort to obtain adequate and timely medical treatment for Mr. Delayo." The lawsuit also names Bernalillo County, which owns the jail and leases it to Cornell. Public Safety Director John Dantis said it's up to Cornell to handle the claim. "The county's response is that it's a Cornell issue. They are the operators," he said. Charles Seigel, a consultant for Cornell, said the company can't comment on the case, but defended the jail's health care. "We do provide an excellent health program, available to detainees in the facility," he said. One of Delayo's lawyers, Frances Crockett, said she has also heard other concerns about medical treatment at the lockup. "It seems to be an epidemic that's going on around the country, and in part with the RCC, of prisoners not receiving adequate medical care," she said. Delayo's lawsuit says he suffered and continues to suffer extreme physical and mental pain from the injury. It also asks for monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial, as well as lawyer's fees. Crockett did not provide details of what led to Delayo's incarceration. Federal court records show Robert Delayo, 43, was indicted in connection with a Jan. 25, 2005, bank robbery of the Wells Fargo Bank at 1800 Eubank Blvd. N.E. He later pleaded guilty to federal charges of use of a firearm during a crime and aiding and abetting. 

Other attorneys, including some from the American Civil Liberties Union, have collected complaints from detainees about crowding, poor medical care and unsanitary conditions inside the jail. Bernalillo County, the U.S. Marshals Service and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement all have contracts to house detainees inside the facility at Fourth Street and Roma Avenue Northwest in Downtown. Cornell officials gave a tour of the jail earlier this month to two reporters, and defended the medical care, calling it "superb." The Department of Homeland Security's Office of the Inspector General also has its eye on the jail after a detainee of Immigration and Customs Enforcement in September died at an Albuquerque hospital while in the custody of the RCC. The ACLU has asked the federal government for more information about immigrant detainees who have died in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The group says 62 have died since 2004 and has filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking details.

_________

In 2008 Mr. Delayo settled all of his claims against all named Defendants for $47,500.00.

_________


August 2008-The Albuquerque Journal

By Scott Sandlin 

ALBUQUERQUE — Saul Canizales resigned as a State Police officer after a May 2005 confrontation outside a bar with off-duty Albuquerque Police Department officers led to battery charges. The charges were later dropped.

Canizales won another measure of vindication in federal court Thursday when a jury found the APD officers had wrongfully arrested him, used excessive force against him and violated his Fourth Amendment rights with malicious prosecution.

A civil jury hearing a lawsuit brought by Canizales against Sgt. Todd Armendariz, Officers Angelo Lovato and Shawn Willoughby and Sgt. Mark Garcia cleared Armendariz and found liability for the others.

The jury, which heard testimony before U.S. District Judge James O. Browning, awarded him a total of $35,000 in damages - $20,000 compensatory damages and $5,000 in punitives against each of the others.

Canizales was leaving the bar with a friend and fellow State Police officer when he became involved in a verbal exchange and found himself criminally charged by the APD officers.

Canizales was forced to resign his position and hire an attorney. Although the charges were dropped by the District Attorney's Office, the media exposure of the incident made it difficult for him to find another job, said his attorney, Frances Crockett.

"My client was wrongfully abused, detained, arrested, and as a result has suffered greatly at the hands of these officers who believe they are above the law," she said when she filed the lawsuit in 2007.

Copyright 2008 The Albuquerque Journal 


 

“Suicide by Cop” Lawsuit Filed   Albuquerque Journal Saturday, May 29, 2010

A wrongful death lawsuit has been filed on behalf of the family of an Iraq war veteran who was fatally shot by a police officer outside a Northeast Albuquerque convenience store.

The suit, filed Friday, names the city of Albuquerque and seeks unspecified compensatory damages and costs. Albuquerque public safety spokesman T.J. Wilham said the department would reserve comment until city attorneys had a chance to review the lawsuit.

On Jan 13, APD Det. Bret Lampiris-Tremba shot 25-year-old Kenneth Ellis during a standoff outside the store at Eubank and Constitution NE. Ellis had been an infantryman with the US Army, said his mother, Annelle Wharton.

                Authorities called the incident “suicide by cop” at the time.

                The lawsuit, filed by the Kennedy Law Firm and the Law Office of Frances Crockett, alleges in two separate counts that the city of Albuquerque was responsible for: “wrongful death due to batter and negligent batter” and “negligent training, supervision and retention.”


An Army of One

Veteran’s sister challenges law enforcement’s PTSD policies

By Marisa Demarco


Jonelle Ellis and her brother, Kenneth Ellis III, who was killed a year ago by Albuquerque police

Jonelle Ellis hasn’t done much public speaking. She's never been involved in politics. But for the last six months or so, she's helped create a bill and convinced legislators in Santa Fe to carry it.

Kenneth Ellis III served in the Army. His father says members of his unit called him Cowboy.

Ellis' brother, a 25-year-old Iraq War veteran, was shot and killed a year ago on Jan. 13, 2010, by Albuquerque police. Kenneth Ellis III stepped out of his car with a gun to his head in front of the 7-Eleven at Constitution and Eubank.

She'd talked to her baby brother just a few days earlier. He wanted to go to the movies. "He was telling me about his son and his life," she says. "He was very positive. It's hard to listen to them say 'suicide by cop.' ”

Jonelle, a Veterans Affairs nurse, says her brother suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and couldn't sleep because of hideous nightmares. "He was active in trying to survive mentally what he had gone through in Iraq." He was doing all the right things to get better, she adds.

The Kenneth Ellis III Act seeks to beef up crisis intervention training for law enforcement officers and emphasizes how they handle people with mental impairments. The training would be mandatory statewide for 911 personnel and police—cadets and longtime officers alike. 2010 saw a spike in the number of officer-involved shootings in Albuquerque; 14 people were shot, and nine of them died. If it’s passed, the legislation will go into effect on July 1.

Frances Crockett is a civil rights lawyer who, along with attorneys Shannon and Joe Kennedy, filed a wrongful death lawsuit for the Ellises in late May. Crockett drafted the legislation after researching other programs around the country. She spoke with the officers who teach Houston's crisis curriculum, and they said the additional education made a big difference in how the police force responds to calls. “Its been a tremendous benefit, because it provides officers with a better understanding about mental illness,” says Frank Webb, a senior officer with Houston’s training program. “It teaches them the tactics and techniques for safely handling someone in a state of crisis.”

"He was telling me about his son and his life. He was very positive. It's hard to listen to them say 'suicide by cop.' ” Jonelle Ellis

The training in Albuquerque is "bare bones," Crockett says, so the measure aims to add on to what's already in place. Albuquerque Police Chief Ray Schultz says the department already does more crisis education than what’s called for in the bill. Crockett says the training the bill requires would be more focused.

Albuquerque cadets typically spend 30 of 900 training hours on crisis intervention and de-escalation, according to Lt. Ray Torres, director of training at the police academy. A few months ago, Torres said APD was anticipating that a measure such as this would come out of the 2011 session [Newscity, " Is There a Silver Bullet?," Oct. 7-13, 2010]. When he spoke with the Alibi in October, he said 125 of the department's nearly 1,100 officers were certified in crisis intervention. As things stand, New Mexico doesn't have mandatory crisis preparation for law enforcement.

After Crockett and the Kennedys did the research and wrote up the legislation, Jonelle began drumming up support. "I've never worked on anything like this," she says. "It is definitely eye-opening. It's going to show that when things aren't right, it doesn't take an entire group to make a difference. It just takes one person to speak up."

First, she talked with her colleagues at the VA. Eventually, she testified in front of the Legislature's Military and Veterans Affairs' Committee. She suggested that additional education would improve the situation for vets suffering from PTSD. She gained the committee's support, and Rep. Edward C. Sandoval will carry the act into the session that begins Tuesday, Jan. 18. As of press time, the measure hadn't yet been filed.

Sandoval, who's represented an Albuquerque district since 1983, says he expects the bill to generate good discussion. "I think it's got a shot," he says. "It's the right thing to do at this point." Though it might require some funding and times are tight, if it's a small amount, he says, the act should survive. "Hopefully, we can make our case."

It shouldn't cost much since it's supplementing officer education that's already in place, Crockett says. "We don't think it's going to be a big strain."

Crockett says she'd be surprised if the police department put up a fight over the Ellis Act. "I don't see how they can disagree with us on this," she says. "For citizens to be as outraged as they are, for APD to be getting this much bad publicity, there is a problem."

Jonelle Ellis makes a point of saying that this isn't an anti-police bill. "They're good people," she says. "It's not that there's bad cops and good cops, it's just that we've got to train people. Education is power. And if they don't have the education, they're going to make mistakes." She adds that she hopes the measure will make a difference, maybe even for APD officers. "A lot of our police department is coming back from Iraq, or served in the National Guard, and they suffer from PTSD also. Maybe they'll seek out treatment they thought they didn't need."

Crockett and Ellis agree that this act doesn't solve everything, but both say "it's a good start."



2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17136, *

JOSEPH LUNDSTROM; JANE HIBNER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALBUQUERQUE POLICE OFFICERS DEBRA ROMERO, ANTHONY SEDLER, LORENZO APODACA, EDOUARD TAYLOR, ZAZZA GREEN, in their individual capacities and as employees of the City of Albuquerque, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-2254

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17136


August 17, 2010, Filed

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. (D.C. NO. 1:07-CV-00759-JCH-WDS).

CASE SUMMARY
PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Appellant arrestees sought review of a decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico, which granted summary judgment for appellee police officers on the basis of qualified immunity in the arrestees' lawsuit alleging that they were unlawfully seized and the home belonging to one of them was unlawfully searched during a confrontation concerning a child welfare check, which was based on the officers' response to a 911 call.

OVERVIEW: An officer knocked at the door and displayed a gun when the owner challenged her. The owner's girlfriend stepped between the owner and the officer; when she exited the home, she was arrested and handcuffed without questioning. The owner was arrested and handcuffed when he stepped outside the home. He contended that the officers used unreasonable force, resulting in injuries, and searched his home before letting him go. On appeal, the court found that the officer effectuated a reasonable seizure in pointing a gun at the owner because she had a reasonable concern about her safety. The girlfriend was not illegally seized when she positioned herself between the owner and officer. However, handcuffing the girlfriend was not a reasonable seizure, and the owner's seizure was not justified since at that time, the officers did not have a basis to believe he had done anything wrong, he did not pose a threat, and there were no exigent circumstances. The owner also sufficiently stated an unreasonable force claim and an unreasonable search. As these Fourth Amendment rights were clearly established, the officers were erroneously granted summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity.

OUTCOME: The court concluded that for the most part, the officers were not entitled to qualified immunity and should not have been granted summary judgment. The court affirmed the district court's qualified immunity decision regarding the seizures based on a display of a weapon at the home's front door, but otherwise reversed the district court's decision and remanded the case for further proceedings on the arrestees' claims.